<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshop Is A Dirty Word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uncommondepth.com/2012/08/photoshop-is-a-dirty-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uncommondepth.com/2012/08/photoshop-is-a-dirty-word/</link>
	<description>Fine Art Pictorialist Photography, Original Paintings, and Sketches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 16:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://uncommondepth.com/2012/08/photoshop-is-a-dirty-word/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 12:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncommondepth.com/?p=2067#comment-393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it is highly unfortunate that Photoshop became viewed that way by some of the general public.   It is as if to tell one of the classic photographers &quot;Oh - you process your own work huh?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is highly unfortunate that Photoshop became viewed that way by some of the general public.   It is as if to tell one of the classic photographers &#8220;Oh &#8211; you process your own work huh?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
